Now that it appears that the Iraq elections have been hugely (is that a word?) successful, what will the Liberal Left Appeasers of the Democrat Party do? As much as they want Iraq to be a repeat of Viet Nam, it just isn't and doesn't look like it ever will be. So what's next?
Recent past history says they'll start harping on Bin Laden. They have to have something to rend their garments and tear their hair about...(that was fun, I bet most the liberal moonbats won't even understand that poke in the eye)
Seriously, they have nothing. Social Security? Health Care? Education? Their tired old ideas suck and they know it. I am genuinely curious as to where they are going to break out, a Democrat "Battle of the Bulge" so to speak...
I can't wait for them to elect Howard Dean as chair of the DNC, if nothing else it will be entertaining.
Yes it is. A word. That, however, was not a sentence. That was. That was not. And so on.
And my vote goes to the Abu Ghraib thing and impeaching Bush, cuz, well, "they did it to Clinton!"
Posted by: ninme | 31 January 2005 at 10:11 AM
Well, I think Dr. Dean will recusitate the Democrats.
I mean, either that or lose his Doctor's licence, eh?
(Joke)
Posted by: Josef | 02 February 2005 at 03:57 PM
Just curious--which part of the elections were hugely successful? The part where the Kurds voted overwhelmingly for independence? Or the part where despite the initial administration spin, it actually doesn't appear that many Sunnis voted at all?
Don't get me wrong--I think the elections were hugely important, because they were an essential predicate for the beginning of getting our troops out of Iraq. I truly hope that Bush's vision for democracy in the Middle East pans out. I am extremely skeptical, however, that an enterprise that has been this poorly conceived and executed from the beginning will turn out well in the end.
Posted by: Steve | 04 February 2005 at 10:15 AM